| Go back or Close Window |
The study was conducted according to an organizational structure which involved participating groups on the national and city level. The responsibilities of the participating groups/participants are outlined below:
- The Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sports commissioned
and sponsored the study.
- The Central Committee on the Treatment of Heroin Addicts (CCBH), installed
by the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sports to develop and conduct the study,
was responsible for the development, conduct and scientific quality of the study.
The CCBH reports directly to the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sports. The
composition of the CCBH and the expertise represented in the CCBH, are outlined
in Appendix 3.
- The National Research Board, headed by the research director,
was responsible for all technical and scientific aspects of the study, including
the analysis of the collected data, and for the co-ordination of the treatment
sites, monitoring, data collection and reporting of the study findings (Appendix
4). The National Research Board reports to the CCBH, and - with regard to the
medical safety and public order issues - to the LVC and LCB, respectively.
- The Inspectorate of Health Care observed and examined the quality of
the care provided and the way and accuracy of registration of the prescribed
heroin (drug accountability). The Inspectorate advised the CCBH, and was present
as observer during the meetings of the CCBH.
- The National Safety Committee (LVC) advised the CCBH, with regard to
the evaluation of severe adverse events and other medical safety issues (Appendix
4). This committee could also advise about possible premature termination of
the study in case of a medically unacceptable negative balance between effectiveness
and harm. The findings of the LVC with regard to the test period of the study
were reported to both the CCBH, and the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sports.
- The National Committee on Public Order and Controllability (LCB) advised
the CCBH, with regard to the evaluation of public order and public safety issues
(Appendix 4). The findings of the LCB with regard to the test period of the
study were reported to both the CCBH, and the Minister of Health, Welfare and
Sports.
Figure 3. Organization of the study

- The draft national study protocol was submitted by the CCBH
to independent international scientific advisors (Appendix 5).
- The national study protocol was submitted by the Minister of Health, Welfare,
and Sports to the Central Committee on Medical Ethics of the Netherlands,
and was approved by this committee. In addition, amendments to the protocol
made in the course of the study were all submitted to, and approved by this
committee.
- The local research teams were responsible for the collection of data
on the local level, in compliance with the national study protocol. In this
capacity, they operated independently from the local treatment sites. In each
study site, a local study co-ordinator was appointed.
- The local treatment sites were responsible for the treatment with heroin
and/or methadone, in compliance with the national protocol. The National Research
Board monitored, through independent monitors, the execution of the treatment
protocol.
- The independent monitoring organization, appointed by the CCBH, monitored
the data collection and the execution of the treatments. The monitoring in this
study was conducted by Kendle. The data management was handled by Imro Tramarko
Group. Both the monitoring organization and the data management organization
reported to the National Research Board.
- The cities involved in the study developed a protocol with respect
to aspects of public order and controllability, and made a contract with the
Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, to conduct the study without impediments.